1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135

73


Torso servoing significantly reduces the magnitude of the excursions in the forward dimension

and, as a side effect, can also reduce the excursions in the lateral dimension.

Figure 4.15 shows

the results for a set of trials which use the same balance control parameters as the walks of Figure

4.3.

In this set of trials,

torso servoing is applied using a desired angle of 5 degrees forward

from vertical.


The resulting paths are straighter and generally more consistent in direction than the non-torso

servoed results. The useful range of Qdincreases in general.


The phase diagram in Figure 4.16

illustrates the effectiveness of torso servoing at reducing the

bobbing

effect

caused

by

the

particular stance hip perturbation used.

In this trial, torso servoing reduces the range of torso

pitch from approximately 12 degrees to 3 degrees.

IMAGE Imgs/thesis.final.w6155.gif

Qlat

Figure 4.16-

Continuous-time up vector component phase diagram for
human model with torso servoing to +5 degrees from
world vertical (Q
servo[!] .09). Compare to Figure 4.2.

4. 5

Robo-bird Running

Figure 4.17 shows the base PCG used to generate a running motion for the robo-bird model,

shown in Figure 4.18.

While the base PCG differs from that used for the human model, it is

balanced using up-vector RVs and stance hip pitch and roll perturbations as with the human

model.

[CONVERTED BY MYRMIDON]